Actually, it's not an 'intellectual' thing. It's an ego thing. You don't need to be smart to have an ego.
"If you knew what I knew..." - But I don't, and you haven't given me any reason to believe you. Try again.
Actually, stating this as "This is my experience" is a better way to state that. Not "your lack of knowledge disqualifies you from your opinion" which is what the example basically says.
"Tell that to $person_something_bad_happened_to, [...]" - Well it's a good thing that we're not talking about $person, then. Please state your counterexamples in the form of substantiated facts. Thanks.
This falls under "sometimes a few suffer for the greater good of the many." It stinks when that includes someone you love. It also falls under "anectdote!=fact".
"All $disadvantaged_minorty has to do is $vague_task." - Anything is possible for someone who doesn't have to do it, good sir.
Actually, the answer is "if it's that simple, why not pass a law requiring it? If there is a law, why haven't they done that?" And if they say "they're lazy/stupid/whatever" then giving a counter-example might help - anectdote!=fact, but knowing that what they're saying isn't true, it's hard to convince them otherwise. Or agree and say, "yes, all they have to do is take the time to do blah, but they don't have time!"
(take losing weight for example. All you have to do is eat less and exercise more. Which requires planning, self-control, and more $$ to eat healthier. Not as simple!)
"Why are you hiding behind a dictionary? We should use the real meaning." - Because if we can't agree on a meaning, then spatula egg martian woodchipper, by which I mean "your wankery flusters me".
This is perfectly fine to say, but it's a sidetrack. "Fine, what's your meaning then? But in this topic, when people say blah they sometimes mean that and sometimes mean this, so which case are we talking about? If we're only talking about what you say is the real meaning, then I have nothing to say, because our fundamental axioms are different."
"We haven't had any $event since $date. Obviously, $policy works." - Actually, I think it's because I forgot to brush my teeth on $date. Prove me wrong.
True. Also, "We haven't had any *publicized* $event that we're aware of...."
"Well I have a cousin who did $thing" - Well, I have a cousin who didn't do $thing. We're even. Can we get back to the topic?
Exactly.
"$assertion now more than ever." - Like anyone could know that.
Eh, that I just let go.
"So you would rather that $bad_thing happened?" - Nice strawman. Glad you got it out of your system. Try again.
If it means that $good_thing will happen, then yes. You cannot live your life avoiding all bad things. It's impossible.
Finally, for one that's specifically on a topic: "Give me ONE example of how YOUR civil rights have been violated since 9/11."
This is a lack of understanding of what it means to have civil rights violated. That's like saying, "Don't put murderers in jail, give me one example of when YOU were murdered."
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: Some agreement, some disagreement
Date: 2006-08-14 01:37 pm (UTC)"If you knew what I knew..."
- But I don't, and you haven't given me any reason to believe you. Try again.
Actually, stating this as "This is my experience" is a better way to state that. Not "your lack of knowledge disqualifies you from your opinion" which is what the example basically says.
"Tell that to $person_something_bad_happened_to, [...]"
- Well it's a good thing that we're not talking about $person, then. Please state your counterexamples in the form of substantiated facts. Thanks.
This falls under "sometimes a few suffer for the greater good of the many." It stinks when that includes someone you love. It also falls under "anectdote!=fact".
"All $disadvantaged_minorty has to do is $vague_task."
- Anything is possible for someone who doesn't have to do it, good sir.
Actually, the answer is "if it's that simple, why not pass a law requiring it? If there is a law, why haven't they done that?" And if they say "they're lazy/stupid/whatever" then giving a counter-example might help - anectdote!=fact, but knowing that what they're saying isn't true, it's hard to convince them otherwise. Or agree and say, "yes, all they have to do is take the time to do blah, but they don't have time!"
(take losing weight for example. All you have to do is eat less and exercise more. Which requires planning, self-control, and more $$ to eat healthier. Not as simple!)
"Why are you hiding behind a dictionary? We should use the real meaning."
- Because if we can't agree on a meaning, then spatula egg martian woodchipper, by which I mean "your wankery flusters me".
This is perfectly fine to say, but it's a sidetrack. "Fine, what's your meaning then? But in this topic, when people say blah they sometimes mean that and sometimes mean this, so which case are we talking about? If we're only talking about what you say is the real meaning, then I have nothing to say, because our fundamental axioms are different."
"We haven't had any $event since $date. Obviously, $policy works."
- Actually, I think it's because I forgot to brush my teeth on $date. Prove me wrong.
True. Also, "We haven't had any *publicized* $event that we're aware of...."
"Well I have a cousin who did $thing"
- Well, I have a cousin who didn't do $thing. We're even. Can we get back to the topic?
Exactly.
"$assertion now more than ever."
- Like anyone could know that.
Eh, that I just let go.
"So you would rather that $bad_thing happened?"
- Nice strawman. Glad you got it out of your system. Try again.
If it means that $good_thing will happen, then yes. You cannot live your life avoiding all bad things. It's impossible.
Finally, for one that's specifically on a topic:
"Give me ONE example of how YOUR civil rights have been violated since 9/11."
This is a lack of understanding of what it means to have civil rights violated. That's like saying, "Don't put murderers in jail, give me one example of when YOU were murdered."