Elias K. Mangosteen (
mangosteen) wrote2004-02-04 11:45 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
YES!!!!!!!
There ain't no "separate but.." in the word "equal", boys.
Supreme Judicial Court rules civil unions aren't enough, same-sex couples entitled to marriage
This means that there will be sane marriage statutes in Mass., come May. I would like to thank the Mass. Supreme Court for injecting some desperately-needed sanity into a country gone mad.
Supreme Judicial Court rules civil unions aren't enough, same-sex couples entitled to marriage
This means that there will be sane marriage statutes in Mass., come May. I would like to thank the Mass. Supreme Court for injecting some desperately-needed sanity into a country gone mad.
no subject
no subject
no subject
*sigh*
no subject
On the other hand, my Idealism was really hoping that this would be the leverage needed
to define that government has no right at all to define what a marriage is, and therefore can ONLY grant civil unions, to ANY kind of couple.
Oh, well.
Re: