I never met a meta.....
Dec. 22nd, 2001 10:26 am(self-directed rant about not writing enough)
(observation on life)
(recent events in life)
(amusing realization that just occurred after ten minutes of staring at what you wrote)
(clever turn of phrase you'll look back on in a year and marvel at the cleverness thereof)
(bittersweet self-deprecation over the incredibly non-original idea of a meta-entry)
(witty conclusion)
(observation on life)
(recent events in life)
(amusing realization that just occurred after ten minutes of staring at what you wrote)
- (itemized list of courses of action due to a recent event)
- (straightforward course of action)
- (humorous, but obviously dumb course of action)
- (mindblowingly clever alternative that only works in the movies)
- (universal quantifier)
- (straightforward course of action)
(clever turn of phrase you'll look back on in a year and marvel at the cleverness thereof)
(bittersweet self-deprecation over the incredibly non-original idea of a meta-entry)
(witty conclusion)
(non-sequitur)
Date: 2001-12-22 08:23 am (UTC)(completely ignores elements of post where writer most emphatically sought input)
Re: (non-sequitur)
Date: 2001-12-22 12:34 pm (UTC)(good line from a song or movie)
Date: 2001-12-22 01:50 pm (UTC)(smug oblique reference as to why said comment was obligatory)
(overt reference to popular media)
no subject
Date: 2001-12-22 10:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-12-23 01:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-12-23 01:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-12-26 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-12-23 03:04 pm (UTC)(smug commentary on how stupid other people are with implication of how much better than them I am for not being so self-centered.)
(cute, but cliche' signature)
no subject
Date: 2001-12-23 05:12 pm (UTC)(pointer to Existential Flame War for hints, tips, and tricks on improving one's existential flamage)
(self-satisfied preening)
(comment in response)
Date: 2001-12-22 01:49 pm (UTC)http://sinfest.net/d/20010616.html
Re: (comment in response)
Date: 2001-12-22 01:52 pm (UTC)(common euphemism for greatly amused)
Re: (comment in response)
Date: 2001-12-23 05:04 pm (UTC)(hasty explanation that someone else pointed me here and I'm not some weird random stalker or anything)
Re: (comment in response)
Date: 2001-12-24 07:32 am (UTC)Is anything random in LJ, anyway?
(expression of amusement and astonishment)
Date: 2001-12-25 06:18 pm (UTC)Re: (expression of amusement and astonishment)
Date: 2001-12-25 09:11 pm (UTC)(query for details on how one might jog one's not-entirely-functional memory to recall the previous meeting)
(obligatory observation on size of planet)
Re: (comment in response)
Date: 2001-12-24 12:20 pm (UTC)A story of character one and character two.
"It's so much easier / to let the listener decide"
Re: (comment in response)
Date: 2004-05-10 05:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-12-22 03:53 pm (UTC)(expression of amusement)
no subject
Date: 2001-12-22 04:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-12-23 07:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-12-25 05:16 am (UTC)(huffy epithet)
Date: 2001-12-25 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-11 10:05 pm (UTC)(snotty suggestion that you post your results to your own #@! journal)
(pun)
Date: 2001-12-23 09:27 pm (UTC)WTF
Date: 2001-12-25 09:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2001-12-25 10:26 pm (UTC)(meta comment)
no subject
Date: 2001-12-26 03:25 am (UTC)(non-witty one-word subject like "so" or "Hey")
Date: 2001-12-29 05:26 pm (UTC)(questionable statement about how respondent has actually done the (humorous, but obviously dumb course of action) discussed above, and that something totally unexpected allegedly happened)
(statement as to how long it took to regain full use of the body part mentioned in previous paragraph)
(non-witty generic closing like "See you later" or "Take it easy")
(name)
(similar, but different non-witty monosyllable)
Date: 2002-01-06 07:50 pm (UTC)(note that the humourous, yet dumb choice was not taken, but will probably claimed so later, for better storytelling opportunities, thus showing morally flexible side of author in a charming way)
no subject
Date: 2002-01-02 09:35 pm (UTC)(topical movie quote)
Date: 2002-01-04 12:14 pm (UTC)(opaque song quote)
Date: 2002-01-06 07:43 pm (UTC)(friend-of-a-friend)
Date: 2002-01-12 10:12 pm (UTC)(attempt to compliment author on originality of subject matter and/or viewpoint)
(hollow encouragement in resolving situation)
Re: (friend-of-a-friend)
Date: 2002-01-13 12:04 pm (UTC)(hour or two of following LJ links to figure out exactly how many RL friends have livejournals, and how they link to each other)
(brief discussion about "friend-of-a-friend" versus "friend" status, and how it relates to quantity and recency of social contact)
no subject
Date: 2002-03-19 06:21 am (UTC)(amused comment about having similarly silly friends)
no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 05:24 am (UTC)(observation of the fact that the comments really make this entry)
no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 01:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 08:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 12:28 pm (UTC)(amusement regarding longevity of posting)
(Start of a sentence which...
Date: 2004-05-11 06:54 pm (UTC)(Link (http://www.livejournal.com/community/som_pos/835607.html?thread=14786327#t14786327) to post which has resulted in new commenting here.)
Re: (Start of a sentence which...
Date: 2004-05-13 01:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 05:56 pm (UTC)(expression of joy for obscure linguistic phrases)
(monosyllabic greeting)
Date: 2004-05-12 01:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 04:56 pm (UTC)(Witticism about the longevity of the Internet)
(Thinly veiled attempt to resurrect old thread)
(Justification of attempt alluding to previous witticism)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-04 06:07 pm (UTC)(clever epigram on the topic of the passage of time)
(amused inquiry as to how commenter had actually found said posting)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-05 04:48 pm (UTC)